Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Seasonal variation of peptic ulcer hemorrhage].

Authors: S C, Shih; T H, Lin; C R, Kao;

[Seasonal variation of peptic ulcer hemorrhage].

Abstract

Retrospectively analysis of 2015 episodes of duodenal ulcer (DU) hemorrhage, and 874 episodes of gastric ulcer (GU) hemorrhage over a 5-year period (April, 1987-March, 1992) evaluated seasonal incidence. For duodenal ulcers, the highest incidence occurred in January, or a total of 231 episodes over 5 years (4.6% of all medical admission), whereas the lowest incidence was in August, with only 101 episodes in the same period (2.1% of medical admission). There was a statistically greater incidence of DU bleeding during the relatively cool winter months, December to March (835 episodes, 4.3%) vs. the warmer summer months, June to September (500 episodes, 2.5%; p < 0.05). For gastric ulcers, the incidence of bleeding was highest in January and February (1.9%) and lowest in September (1.1%). As with DU, GU bleeding was more common in winter (332 episodes, 1.7%) than in summer (243 episodes, 1.2%; p < 0.05). Over one year of this series (DU bleeds: 390, GU bleeds: 167), there was no predilection for a particular day of the week. Of patients evaluated in that year, 87 with DU and 17 with GU had history of bleeding at least one time before. However, there was no seasonal correlation with the previous bleeding episodes. It was concluded that there is seasonal variation in the incidence of peptic ulcer hemorrhage in our country. However, it is not possible to predict when in the year patients are likely to rebleed.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Taiwan, Middle Aged, Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage, Humans, Female, Seasons, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!