Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

1992 hospital charges for two major surgical procedures for cardiovascular diseases. Part II: Cardiac catheterization.

1992 hospital charges for two major surgical procedures for cardiovascular diseases. Part II: Cardiac catheterization.

Abstract

In-hospital cardiac catheterization (CC) charges among MetLife group health insureds and their dependents averaged $10,880 during 1992. Among the 24 states in which 50 or more CCs were performed, the average total charges ranged from a low of $6,400 in Maryland to a high of $17,600 in California. Not only were these California charges 2.75 times higher than the lowest ones, they were also 62 percent higher than the U.S. average. Illinois registered the second highest average total charges ($14,340) and Wisconsin reported the second lowest ($7,320). On average, the hospital portion of the CC charges accounted for 82 percent of the total, ranging from 86 percent of the total charges in California, Colorado and Alabama to 70 percent in New York and 71 percent in New Jersey. Ancillary fees accounted for 62 percent of the total hospital charges and averaged $5,530 across the country. Physician fees averaged $2,000 for a CC in 1992, with these charges being the highest in California ($2,550--28 percent above the U.S. average) and the lowest in South Carolina ($1,300--32 percent below the norm for the country). Length of stay averaged four days with very little variation evident between regions or states.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Health Care Costs, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Hospital Charges, Insurance, Hospitalization, United States, Cost of Illness, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!