
Since 1928, 22 professional agencies have established certification procedures for 52 categories or levels of health laboratory personnel. Surveys indicate that 55% of technical personnel are certified by at least one registry or board. After reviewing some of the pros and cons of certification and its expanding role, the author concludes that certification has become a positive factor in calling attention to the need for quality personnel in health laboratories and has helped meet the needs of individuals and the public. Current movements to work together in a National Commission for Health Certifying Agencies and toward national certification standards are encouraging.
Certification, Allied Health Personnel, Workforce, Humans, Laboratories, Societies, United States
Certification, Allied Health Personnel, Workforce, Humans, Laboratories, Societies, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
