Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Flore (Florence Rese...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Third-Generation Cytogenetic Analysis: Diagnostic Application of Long-Read Sequencing.

Authors: Magini, Pamela; Mingrino, Alessandra; Gega, Barbara; Mattei, Gianluca; Semeraro, Roberto; Bolognini, Davide; Mongelli, Patrizia; +4 Authors

Third-Generation Cytogenetic Analysis: Diagnostic Application of Long-Read Sequencing.

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) play important roles in the pathogenesis of several genetic syndromes. Traditional and molecular karyotyping are considered the first-tier diagnostic tests to detect macroscopic and cryptic deletions/duplications. However, their time-consuming and laborious experimental protocols protract diagnostic times from 3 to 15 days. Nanopore sequencing has the ability to reduce time to results for the detection of CNVs with the same resolution of current state-of-the-art diagnostic tests. Nanopore sequencing was compared to molecular karyotyping for the detection of pathogenic CNVs of seven patients with previously diagnosed causative CNVs of different sizes and cellular fractions. Larger chromosomal anomalies included trisomy 21 and mosaic tetrasomy 12p. Among smaller CNVs, two genomic imbalances of 1.3 Mb, a small deletion of 170 kb, and two mosaic deletions (1.2 Mb and 408 kb) were tested. DNA was sequenced and data generated during runs were analyzed in online mode. All pathogenic CNVs were identified with detection time inversely proportional to size and cellular fraction. Aneuploidies were called after only 30 minutes of sequencing, whereas 30 hours were needed to call small CNVs. These results demonstrate the clinical utility of our approach that allows the molecular diagnosis of genomic disorders within a 30-minute to 30-hour time frame and its easy implementation as a routinary diagnostic tool.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Chromosome Aberrations, DNA Copy Number Variations, Karyotyping, Aneuploidy; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA Copy Number Variations; Humans; Karyotyping; Chromosome Disorders, Humans, Chromosome Disorders, Aneuploidy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities