
Diagnostic delay of breast cancer is linked to poor prognosis and survival. It can be caused by patients or healthcare providers. Since there is no quantification of provider delay and total delay in Pakistan, the general picture of breast cancer diagnostic delay is poorly understood. This study was conducted to quantify total delay, provider delay, and patient delay, along with the factors contributing to each type of delay in breast cancer management.This was a descriptive study conducted over 3 years at a hospital in Karachi. Convenience sampling was used. Breast cancer patients undergoing treatment were interviewed. Values for diagnostic delays extracted from literature were >12 weeks in seeking care as patient delay and >4 weeks in treatment initiation as provider delay.A total of 334 patients were included in the analysis. Mean total delay was 56±52 weeks, the median (IQR) patient delay was 4 (0-22) weeks, and the median provider delay was 17 (9-52) weeks. Patient delay was found in 149 (44.6%), and provider delay was found in 269 (80.5%) patients. Believing symptoms to resolve on their own was the most common reason (24.9%) for patient delay. Seeking multiple opinions (43.7%) and misdiagnosis (43.4%) were the most common reasons for provider delay.Patients and providers both caused diagnostic delay in breast cancer treatment. There is a need to increase awareness in the general population and enhance the training of providers regarding timely recognition in all patients presenting with breast-related symptoms.
Adult, Delayed Diagnosis, Time Factors, Health Personnel, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Hospitals, Tertiary Care Centers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Pakistan, Aged
Adult, Delayed Diagnosis, Time Factors, Health Personnel, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Hospitals, Tertiary Care Centers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Pakistan, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
