Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Phase I trials of poly(I,C) complexes in advanced cancer.

Authors: S E, Krown; D, Kerr; W E, Stewart; A K, Field; H F, Oettgen;

Phase I trials of poly(I,C) complexes in advanced cancer.

Abstract

We have performed Phase I trials of two synthetic double-stranded polyribonucleotide complexes--poly(I,C)-LC, a complex of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid with poly-L-lysine and carboxymethylcellulose, and poly(I,C)-L, which lacks carboxymethylcellulose--in patients with advanced cancer. With poly(I,C)-LC, several treatment schedules were investigated in an attempt to decrease toxicity and maximize interferon (IFN) induction. The best tolerated was an alternate-day schedule, with gradual dose escalation. Daily short infusions and continuous (24-h) infusions were tolerated less well. Maximum tolerated doses varied over a several hundredfold dose range. Toxicity consisted of fever, rigors, hypotension, and blood count depression. Two patients treated with poly(I,C)-L developed systemic allergic reactions, and antibodies to poly(I,C)-L and its components were detected in the serum of some patients treated with both compounds. IFN-alpha was induced in most patients at serum levels similar to those achieved after intramuscular administration of human IFN-alpha. Of 32 patients, one with renal cell carcinoma showed partial tumor regression. Poly(I,C) complexes are effective IFN inducers in humans, but their toxicity limits their use in cancer patients.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Drug Tolerance, Leukopenia, Methylcellulose, Middle Aged, Kidney Neoplasms, Killer Cells, Natural, Poly I-C, Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, Neoplasms, Antibody Formation, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Female, Polylysine, Interferons, Hypotension, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!