Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Growth characteristics of two cherry cultivars grafted on interstocks

Authors: Kaymakanov, Pantaley; Tabakov, Sava; Yordanov, Anton;

Growth characteristics of two cherry cultivars grafted on interstocks

Abstract

The influence of three interstocks on the growth of 7-9-year-old trees of the sweet cherry cultivars Biggareau burlat and Stella grafted on Prunus mahaleb L. – P1 seedling rootstock during the 2012-2014 period was tested. The Gisela 5 rootstock, the North Star sour cherry cultivar and Hybrid 2/10 were used as interstocks, each of them being 10cm and 30cm long. The same sweet cherry cultivars grafted directly on P1 were used as control. The control had the thickest trunks in the zone of rootstock. In terms of trunk thickness in the scion zone the control surpassed only the variants with short interstock. It was established that under the influence of longer interstocks the trunk thickness was reduced in the zone of the rootstock and the interstock, but it was increased in the zone of the scion, and the differences were significant mainly with Gisela 5. The crown volume of the Bigarreau burlat cultivar with interstock was reduced compared with the control, while the use of a longer interstock made the reduction larger. The highest values of one-year shoot growth was recorded in the control, while in the other variants higher values of one-year shoot growth was recorded in the trees with short interstock compared with those with long interstock although the differences were not always significant. Trees with longer interstock had significantly more suckers than those with shorter interstock but the suckers formed by the control were almost nil.

Country
Bulgaria
Keywords

interstocks, growth, Prunus avium, shoots

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!