Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Risk factors for suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtering surgery. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group.

Risk factors for suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtering surgery. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group.

Abstract

In the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study, ten of 162 eyes (6.2%) that had undergone previous cataract extraction developed a nonexpulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtering surgery. Of the previously reported risk factors, including age, myopia, history of vitrectomy, history of 5-fluorouracil injections, postoperative hypotony, and high preoperative intraocular pressure, only high preoperative intraocular pressure was statistically significant (P = .002). The risk of suprachoroidal hemorrhage was strongly associated with the level of the preoperative intraocular pressure. None of the 63 patients with a preoperative intraocular pressure less than 30 mm Hg, three of the 47 patients (6%) with a preoperative intraocular pressure between 30 and 39 mm Hg, four of the 36 patients (11%) with a preoperative intraocular pressure between 40 and 49 mm Hg, two of the 12 patients (17%) with a preoperative intraocular pressure between 50 and 59 mm Hg, and one of four patients with an intraocular pressure more than 60 mm Hg developed a suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Because the preoperative intraocular pressure was highly correlated with the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative intraocular pressure, it was not possible to distinguish which factor was clinically more important.

Keywords

Choroid Hemorrhage, Incidence, Visual Acuity, Glaucoma, Trabeculectomy, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Humans, Fluorouracil, Intraocular Pressure, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!