
To determine the effect of soft-start polymerization of resin-based composites on the marginal gap formation in dentin cavities.Cylindrical cavities were prepared in dentin in extracted human molars. The cavities were distributed into 8 groups. The teeth in groups 1-4 were treated with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and restored with Z100, and the teeth in groups 5-8 were treated with OptiBond FL and restored with Herculite XRV. The restorations were light-cured for 40 s by four different curing modes. The marginal gap formation was measured in a light microscope after a 20 min water-storage, and the wall-to-wall contraction was calculated as the widest gap in percent of the cavity diameter.Soft-start light curing did not influence wall-to-wall contraction in dentin cavities. OptiBond FL and Herculite XRV showed less wall-to-wall contraction than did Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Z100.The soft-start polymerization procedures studied did not improve the marginal adaptation of two resin composites bonded to dentin cavities compared with conventional polymerization.
Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Light, Polymers, Surface Properties, Viscosity, Water, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Silicon Dioxide, Composite Resins, Statistics, Nonparametric, Resin Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Dentin, Humans, Zirconium, Dental Cavity Preparation
Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Light, Polymers, Surface Properties, Viscosity, Water, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Silicon Dioxide, Composite Resins, Statistics, Nonparametric, Resin Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Dentin, Humans, Zirconium, Dental Cavity Preparation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
