Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CONICET Digital
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

Speciation

Authors: Crawford, Daniel; Stuessy, Todd; Takayama, Koji; López Sepúlveda, Patricio; Anderson, Gregory; Bernardello, Gabriel Luis Mario;
Abstract

Speciation is arguably the most fundamental process in plant evolution because it leads to evolutionary lines that represent the basic units of plant classification, the species, and is the means of diversification within lineages (Rieseberg & Brouillet, 1994; Coyne & Orr, 2004). Also, the plant diversity for given areas is usually presented in terms of species richness, and thus species enter prominently into discussions of conservation (Steele & Pires, 2011). Despite the central role of the origin of species in plant evolutionary biology, there is no one universally accepted species concept for plants nor is there a comprehensive, refined understanding of the process(es) of speciation. Indeed, the lack of a single species concept in plants, and the extensive biological/philosophical debates and discussions of the species concepts have historically retarded the study of speciation (Rieseberg & Willis, 2007). Species concepts have been reviewed extensively elsewhere, and thus will not be considered in detail here (de Queiroz, 1998, 2007; Coyne & Orr, 2004, pp. 447-472, and references therein; Hausdorf, 2011; Shapiro & al., 2016). Most importantly, as argued by de Queiroz (1998, 2007), despite the different concepts of species, there is general agreement that species are independently evolving metapopulation lineages. Thus, speciation can be discussed from the perspective of the factors promoting divergence into independent lineages. Having said this, however, it must be emphasized that determining the lineages may be difficult, especially when different criteria suggest incongruent species boundaries, or when certain criteria indicate divergence between populations but others do not. As indicated by Bacon & al. (2012) and others, these issues may be especially problematical in island plants where divergence and speciation are often recent. Recent divergence may not have provided sufficient time for completion of the speciation process in the sense that there has not been sorting out and divergence in the attributes commonly seen in ?older? continental species. However, as noted below, paradoxically, this is also an advantage when studying the process. In addition to speciation via divergence, so-called primary speciation, species may originate by hybridization between two differentiated populations (usually recognized as species) at the same ploidy level to give stabilized, novel phenotypes that are isolated from each of the parental species. This is most commonly called homoploid hybrid speciation (Rieseberg, 1997; Mallet, 2007; Yakimowski & Rieseberg, 2014). An increase in ploidy level is also a mechanism of speciation and may involve chromosome doubling within species (autopolyploidy) or be associated with hybridization between species (allopolyploidy), see Soltis & al. (2014) for an excellent mini review. In this chapter, the emphasis is on primary speciation because it is the most frequent, if not exclusive, mode of speciation in Juan Fernández (JF) plants.

Fil: Bernardello, Gabriel Luis Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina

Fil: Crawford, Daniel. Ohio State University; Estados Unidos. Universidad de Concepción; Chile

Fil: Anderson, Gregory. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos

Fil: López Sepúlveda, Patricio. Universidad de Concepción; Chile

Fil: Stuessy, Todd. Ohio State University; Estados Unidos

Fil: Takayama, Koji. Universidad de Concepción; Chile

Country
Argentina
Keywords

Evolution, Oceanic islands, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Origin of species, Conservation, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!