Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Fastlegenes erfaringer og opplevelse av legemiddelgjennomganger i allmennpraksis. En spørreundersøkelse

Authors: Haglund, Victoria Eva Naemi;

Fastlegenes erfaringer og opplevelse av legemiddelgjennomganger i allmennpraksis. En spørreundersøkelse

Abstract

Life expectancy in Norway is steadily increasing and many elderly lives longer with chronic diseases and illnesses. Older people are large-scale consumers of both healthcare services and medications. Studies have estimated that almost one-third of Norwegians over the age of 65 were prescribed unnecessary medications and almost 60% were prescribed five or more drugs a year. Use of too many and potentially unnecessary medications amongst elderly increases the risk of side-effects and adverse events. Regular medication reviews carried out by general practitioners (GP) can be a useful tool to reduce the extent and consequences of polypharmacy. In 2013 the Norwegian parliament made it compulsory for GP`s to carry out regular medication reviews in patients using four or more drugs on a regular basis. At the same time a fixed reimbursement rate for systematic medication reviews were introduced in order to stimulate general practitioners to carry out such reviews more frequently. However, it is not yet known to which extent the GP`s consider such reviews useful and whether the new regulations have brought about any changes to their practice. In order to answer these questions, we designed a questionnaire with a total of ten questions that was sent to all general practitioners in Telemark county. We found that the majority of the respondents thought systematic medication reviews were useful and beneficial to their patients, and that most of them carried out such reviews on a regular basis. More than half of the GP`s claimed to carry out such reviews more frequently after the introduction of the reimbursement rate. Most of the GP`s were confident in making changes to the respective patient`s medications if considered necessary, regardless of whether the treatment was initiated by a specialist or not. Furthermore, Norwegian general practitioners have experienced a large increase in their workloads over the last few years, and time-consuming tasks such as systematic medication reviews are not financially attractive and thus not prioritized. We believe that strengthening the Norwegian general practice system, with shorter patient-lists and a closer collaboration with in-hospital specialists are necessary to allow the GP`s to handle the seemingly ever-increasing number of new tasks, including systematic medication reviews.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

610

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities