Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HIØ Bragearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
HIØ Brage
Article . 2021
Data sources: HIØ Brage
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Sykepleierstudenters erfaringer med Respons – et nytt lærings- og vurderingsverktøy i praksisstudier

Authors: Amsrud, Kirsten Eika; Skaug, Eli-Anne; Saunes, Jorunn; Undheim, Liv-Thorhild; Lyberg, Anne;

Sykepleierstudenters erfaringer med Respons – et nytt lærings- og vurderingsverktøy i praksisstudier

Abstract

Vurdering av kompetanse i praksisstudier er en kjent utfordring i sykepleierutdanninger både i Norge og internasjonalt. Denne studien utforsker sykepleierstudenters erfaringer med det nye lærings- og vurderingsverktøyet Respons. Studien har en kvalitativ tilnærming med et beskrivende og utforskende design. Det var 27 sykepleierstudenter fra tre læresteder som deltok i utprøving av det nye verktøyet, 21 av disse møtte til påfølgende intervju i fokusgrupper. Dataanalysen er gjennomført i tråd med prinsipper for kvalitativ innholdsanalyse og ledet til to kategorier: Styrket eierskap og framdrift i læringsprosessen og Økt tillit til vurderingens kvalitet. Mange av informantene beskrev en mer aktiv holdning til egen læring og tettere samhandling med sine praksisveiledere. Flere var opptatt av at Respons i større grad enn tidligere vurderingsverktøy bidro til løpende vurdering. Informantene la også vekt på at Respons sikrer en felles standard for vurdering. Studien understøtter behovet for å utforske hvordan læringsutbyttestyrt pedagogikk utspiller seg i praksishverdagen. Abstract Assessment of competence in clinical studies is a well-known challenge in nursing education both in Norway and internationally. The aim of this study was to investigate nursing students' experiences with the new learning and assessment tool Response. The study has a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory design. The new tool was tested by 27 nursing students. The following interviews in focus groups included 21 students. A process of content analysis identified two categories: Strengthened ownership and progress in the learning process and increased confidence in the quality of assessment. The findings revealed experiences of a more active attitude to the students’ own learning process and a closer interaction with their supervisors. Furthermore, the students reported that the new assessment tool contributed to ongoing assessment and ensured a common standard for assessment. Finally, the study supports the need to explore how learning outcome-driven policy unfolds in everyday practice.

Country
Norway
Keywords

praksisstudier, fokusgrupper, VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808, assessment, RT1-120, focus groups, clinical studies, Nursing, vurdering, nursing students, sykepleierstudenter

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
Published in a Diamond OA journal
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities