Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ African Journal of A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
African Journal of Agricultural Research
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

An insight into guinea fowl rearing practices and productivity by guinea fowl keepers in Zimbabwe

Authors: null N. T. Kusina,;

An insight into guinea fowl rearing practices and productivity by guinea fowl keepers in Zimbabwe

Abstract

The production practices used to rear seventy-three guinea fowl flocks in a semi-arid zone in north-eastern Zimbabwe were investigated during the period of June to July 2002. Data were generated using participatory research appraisal techniques. Extensive (scavenging) and semi-intensive rearing systems were the two types of rearing systems practiced, with the former accounting for 81% participants. Both practices farmed an indigenous helmeted guinea fowl (Numidia meleagris). Men managed approximately 69% of flocks while the fowl was reared for cash generation. Average productivity indices were: flock size8±6 birds (range: 2 to 30/keeper); egg production 89±50 eggs (range: 0 to 200 eggs/hen); hatchability 64% (range: 0 to 100%) and keet survival rate 60% (range: 0 to 100%). Provision of supplementary feed was given to birds under the semi-intensive feeding regime. Feed was offered in a haphazard manner and feed offered comprised mainly of crushed maize, millet or sorghum grains. Ethno veterinary services were used as substitute for conventional veterinary support. Housing provided was substandard. From the results, it was inferred that scavenging was the popular rearing system, however, overall flock productivity compromised of immense eggs losses, poor hatchability and high keet mortality; but there is merit to pursue research for better management styles as strategy to enhance productivity. Key words: Guinea fowl, rearing, practice, productivity, rural, Zimbabwe.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
gold