
This paper studies velocity control of a low-pressure water hydraulic cylinder drive. Two different systems are used, one with a proportional 4/3-way directional control valve and one with a proportional flow control valve. Experimental results with the proportional directional valve show that good control results can be achieved with closed-loop control system. Compensation of system nonlinearities allows also open-loop velocity control, which gives quite good accuracy in constant conditions. However external load force increases the velocity error and when good accuracy is needed in varying load conditions, the closed-loop control system has to be used. The results with the flow control valve are not as good but on the other hand the price of the valve is lower, which supports the use of this valve if the accuracy demand is not so high.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
