
doi: 10.5700/rege552
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this article is to verify if voluntary adherence to the highest standards of corporate governance (shares traded in the Differentiated Levels of Corporate Governance and in BM & FBovespa’s New Stock Exchange) by Brazilian companies resulted in the creation of value and in higher economic and financial performance after accession and in comparison with companies with shares listed in the traditional market. Empirical research was conducted in a non-probabilistic sample of 66 companies listed in BM&FBovespa, 25 of which in the traditional market (reference group), 25 already listed in some level of differentiated governance before 2005 and 16 who migrated during the analyzed period. Quarterly data were analyzed from 2005 to 2011, forming a balanced panel with 1,848 observations. The tests were conducted in six models with panel data (fixed and random effects) for value creation variables (Tobin’s q and Market-to-book ratio) and economic and financial performance (ROA, ROE, Net Income and EBIT). Some control variables were also inserted (leverage, size, concentration of ownership, type of control and issuance of ADRs). The results found indicated that companies that have adopted different practices of GC are more likely to create value to shareholders than the ones in the traditional market, but present a poorer economic and financial performance (EBIT and net profit).
Corporate Governance, Governança Corporativa, Criação de Valor, Value Creation, Economic and Financial Performance, Rendimiento Económico-financiero, Desempenho Econômico-financeiro, Gobernanza Corporativa, Creación de Valor
Corporate Governance, Governança Corporativa, Criação de Valor, Value Creation, Economic and Financial Performance, Rendimiento Económico-financiero, Desempenho Econômico-financeiro, Gobernanza Corporativa, Creación de Valor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
