
We propose a model to evaluate the U.K.’s zero-hours contract (ZHC) – a contract that exempts employers from the requirement to provide any minimum working hours, and allows workers to decline any workload. We find quantitatively mixed welfare effects of ZHCs. On one hand they unlock job creation among firms that face highly volatile business conditions and increase labor force participation of individuals who prefer flexible work schedules. On the other hand, the use of ZHCs by less volatile firms, where jobs are otherwise viable under regular contracts, reduces welfare and likely explains negative employee reactions to this contract.
working hours, ddc:330, Working hours, J22, gig economy, J23, Zero-hours contracts, zero-hours contracts, flexibility, E24, J63, L84, Flexibility, Gig economy, Flexible work arrangements; Job search; Welfare; Zero-hours contracts.
working hours, ddc:330, Working hours, J22, gig economy, J23, Zero-hours contracts, zero-hours contracts, flexibility, E24, J63, L84, Flexibility, Gig economy, Flexible work arrangements; Job search; Welfare; Zero-hours contracts.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
