
The paper focuses on judicial review of political or quasi-political/quasi-legal decisions or other acts of the institutions of the EU involved in following procedures designed to protect the value of rule of law: a) mechanism for protection of values under Art. 7 of the Treaty on European Union and b) measures adopted within the conditionality for the protection of the EU budget (Regulation 2020/2029). At a first sight, the difference between the judicial review of measures aimed to protect rule of law in the Member States under Art. 7 TEU and under Regulation 2020/2029 can appear straightforward: a limited procedural review of measures adopted under Art 7 TEU due to specific powers stipulated in Art. 269 TFEU and full judicial review of measures adopted under Regulation 2020/2029. However, notwithstanding different structures, and uncertainties stemming from the wording of the Treaties, the Treaties provide a comprehensive framework of judicial control of analyzed types of measures aimed to avoid backsliding rule of law in the Member States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
