Comparison between Kriging and GWR for the Spatial Data

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 01 Jul 2005 English Publisher:The Korean Statistical SocietyJournal:Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, volume 18, pages 271-280 (issn: 1225-066X,

Copyright policy )

doi: 10.5351/kjas.2005.18.2.271

Comparison between Kriging and GWR for the Spatial Data

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Kriging methods as traditional spatial data analysis methods and geographical weighted regression models as statistical analysis methods are compared. In this paper, we apply data from the Ministry of Environment to spatial analysis for practical study. We compare these methods to performance with monthly carbon monoxide observations taken at 116 measuring area of air pollution in 1999.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average