Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO; Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Promoting trust in preprints by linking peer reviews to preprints via Europe PMC

Authors: Harrison, Melissa;

Promoting trust in preprints by linking peer reviews to preprints via Europe PMC

Abstract

Europe PMC provides comprehensive access to life sciences literature from trusted sources; containing 42.1 million life science publications. Since 2018 Europe PMC has been indexing preprints and now indexes over half a million preprint abstracts from life sciences preprint servers, and over 40,000 full text preprints that are either related to Covid-19 or are funded by one of Europe PMC’s funders. Peer review is the de facto process to determine whether an article is published in a journal. However, this process introduces delays to the publication process, is subject to bias, and is a binary decision that results in publication or the author approaching a new journal and repeating the process. This is generally done behind closed doors and without pre-printing this output remains hidden from the community until accepted by a journal for publication. Preprinting has sped up the process of releasing scientific outputs and preprint peer review is an emerging practice that allows reviews from independent researchers to help authors improve their manuscripts and provide readers with increased confidence in the findings reported in a preprint. It is done in the open, speeding up the dissemination of science as well as discussion around the scientific outputs. Europe PMC has developed an open source parser to select relevant metadata available from DocMaps (A community-endorsed framework for capturing valuable context about the processes used to create documents in a machine-readable way) produced by Sciety (a preprint peer review aggregation platform) and Review Commons (a service to create high-quality peer review of preprints before journal submission) and will be pulling in the relevant information for display on Europe PMC. This talk discusses the benefits and potential advantages of this technology and our future plans to enhance trust in preprints via preprint peer review.

Keywords

Preprints, Scholarly publishing, Open Science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities