
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This contribution seeks to compare the efficiency of several soft-sensor design methods using the datasets from three different case studies, including two industrial examples. The selected set of design methods compared considers different principles to design soft sensors, consisting of three consequent stages: (a) data preprocessing with input domain analysis, (b) input structure selection, and (c) model training. The input domain analysis explores the potential of various nonlinear structures within the input dataset. The results obtained indicate that multivariate feature selection approaches have the highest efficiency. Moreover, the nonlinear soft sensors achieve higher accuracy compared to linear ones.
industrial processes, feature selection, soft sensors, model training
industrial processes, feature selection, soft sensors, model training
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 26 | |
downloads | 25 |