Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

On the taxonomy of Lasiurus

Authors: Francis, Charles M.; Simmons, Nancy B.; Van Cakenberghe, Victor; Upham, Nathan S.; Burgin, Connor J.; on behalf of the Global Bat Taxonomy Working Group of the IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group;
Abstract

### Author's note: this taxonomic decision is part of a series by members of the Global Bat Taxonomy Working Group to help settle ongoing disputes in the taxonomic literature and suggest targets for data collection. See the concise conclusion below as well as the full article with background and justification in PDF & DOCX formats for download. ### RECOMMENDATION We recommend the recognition of Lasiurus, Dasypterus, and Aeorestes as subgenera within the genus Lasiurus for the following reasons: The genus Lasiurus thus defined is monophyletic; The use of subgenera is appropriate to recognize groupings within the genus; There are no objective criteria for suggesting that a particular timing or degree of divergence merits elevating these subgenera to genera, and in any case there is considerable uncertainty in estimated divergence times of these groups and other genera in the family Vespertilionidae; and finally that Retention of the genus Lasiurus for all members of the tribe Lasiurini meets the ICZN (1999) goal of promoting maximum stability in nomenclature. 

54 references, page 1 of 6

Handley, C.O. Jr. (1960) Descriptions of new bats from Panama. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 112 (3442): 459 - 479.

https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.112-3442.459

Ho, S. Y. W., & Phillips, M. J. (2009). Accounting for Calibration Uncertainty in Phylogenetic Estimation of Evolutionary Divergence Times. Systematic Biology, 58(3), 367-380.

https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp035

Hoofer, S.R., & Van Den Bussche, R.A. (2003). Molecular phylogenetics of the chiropteran family Vespertilionidae. Acta Chiropterologica, 5 (Suppl.), 1-63.

https://doi.org/10.3161/001.005.s101

Hoofer, S.R., Van Den Bussche, R.A., & Horáček, I. (2006). Generic status of the American Pipistrelles (Vespertilionidae) with description of a new genus. Journal of Mammalogy, 87 (5): 981-992.

https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-425R1.1

Hoofer, S. R., Solari, S., Larsen, P. A., Bradley, R. D., & Baker, R. J. (2008). Phylogenetics of the fruit-eating bats (Phyllostomidae: Artibeina) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Museum of Texas Tech University, Occasional Papers, 277: 1-15.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 261
    download downloads 186
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
  • 261
    views
    186
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
261
186
Green