Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

D2.1 – Draft inventory of LLs, RI and Agroecology-Territories

Authors: Mahdavi Parastoo; Vandenbroucke Perrine;

D2.1 – Draft inventory of LLs, RI and Agroecology-Territories

Abstract

Work package 2 (WP2) focuses on the assessment and analysis of living labs (LL) and research infrastructures (RI) in the past and present independent of the scale and place at which they operate. To support the development of LLs and RIs in Europe, a set of indicators for the successful transition of agricultural production systems towards sustainability is identified and will be employed for evaluating the respective infrastructures and functionality of LL and RI. This set of indicators will be linked to opportunities to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDG) through agroecology and LL and RI. In order to identify skills, tools and methods that are promising drivers for future agroecosystem LL and RI, WP2 has elaborated on the two concepts of Living Labs and Agroecology Territories. For both concepts, trait and indicator grids were developed which are used for a more comprehensive data and information acquisition with the aim of getting representative samples of LL and AET across Europe. Based on the first steps taken in the two tasks and the preliminary analyses undertaken, the following conclusions can be drawn: The two concepts of Agroecology Territories and Living Labs are both related to agroecological transformation of production and sustainable food systems. They aim at encouraging policy making towards schemes for innovation in natural resource governance and sustainable rural livelihoods. While the trait catalog for LL and the grid of transition processes for AET have been designed with concertation between TI and ISARA, the need for different indicators to characterize and assess both concepts became apparent. Although the two concepts cannot completely be merged, some place-based LL could be considered as AET such as Agroecology Living Labs and some AET can be considered as Living Labs if they include research infrastructures and networks, for instance through participatory research programs. The trait-- and indicator-based approaches of T2.1 and T2.3 will have a positive impact on the understanding of the stakeholders, providing a deeper understanding of the important functional and structural components of LL and AET. They will further help identifying initiatives that do not consider themselves as LL or AET and will help in placing those initiatives into a general framework of infrastructures accelerating the transition towards sustainable production and food systems. When successful, both concepts will be used for informing the creation of the European Partnership an Agroecology and the approaches of trait- and indicator based assessments of LL and AET will disseminated to groups of stakeholders at the European as well as national level and engagement in application of the approach by stakeholders will be supported.

Keywords

Agroecology territory, Trait based approach, Living lab, Agroecology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 56
    download downloads 33
  • 56
    views
    33
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
56
33
Green