Downloads provided by UsageCountsPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Migranticization
Janine Dahinden;
Janine Dahinden;
Migranticization
Migranticization can be understood as those sets of performative practices that ascribe a migratory status to certain people and bodies – labelling them (im)migrants, second-generation migrants, people with migration background, minorities, etc. – and thus (re-)establish their a priori non-belonging, regardless of whether the people designated as ‘migrants’ are citizens of the nation-state they reside in or not, and regardless of whether they have crossed a national border or not. Migranticization can be considered as a technology of power and governance; it places people in a distinct hierarchy which goes along with an unequal distribution of societal symbolic and material resources while it affirms a national ‘we’ within a system of global inequalities. The suggestion is to use migranticization as an analytical lens which makes it possible to investigate the uses of migration-related categories and their consequences in terms of power and ex/inclusion from/in a global system of inequalities and nation-states.
Nation-state logic, coloniality, racialization, migratory status, technology of governance, power relations
Nation-state logic, coloniality, racialization, migratory status, technology of governance, power relations
2213
Amelina, Anna. 2021. "After the reflexive turn in migration studies: Towards the doing migration approach." Population, Space and Place 27 (1): e2368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2368.
Anderson, Bridget. 2019. "New directions in migration studies: Towards methodological denationalism." Comparative Migration Studies 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878- 019-0140-8.
Dahinden, Janine. 2016. "A plea for the 'de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration." Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (13): 2207-2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129. [OpenAIRE]
Dahinden, Janine, and Anna C. Korteweg. 2022. "Culture as politics in contemporary migration contexts: The in/visibilization of power relations." Ethnic and Racial Studies: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2022.2121171.
De Genova, Nicholas. 2017. "The borders of 'Europe' and the European question." In The Borders of "Europe": Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, edited by Nicholas De Genova, 1-35. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Favell, Adrian. 2022. The Integration Nation: Immigration and Colonial Power in Liberal Democracies. Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity Press. [OpenAIRE]
Kunz, Sarah. 2019. "Expatriate, migrant? The social life of migration categories and the polyvalent mobility of race." Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584525.
Malkki, Liisa. 1992. "National Geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees." Cultural Anthropology 7 (1): 24- 44. [OpenAIRE]
Mayblin, Lucy, and Joe Turner. 2021. Migration Studies and Colonialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average views 417 downloads 339 citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average - 417views339downloads
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP!influenceInfluence provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Influence provided by BIP!impulseImpulse provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
Impulse provided by BIP!viewsViews provided by UsageCounts
Views provided by UsageCountsdownloadsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts 0
Average
Average
Average
417
339
Migranticization can be understood as those sets of performative practices that ascribe a migratory status to certain people and bodies – labelling them (im)migrants, second-generation migrants, people with migration background, minorities, etc. – and thus (re-)establish their a priori non-belonging, regardless of whether the people designated as ‘migrants’ are citizens of the nation-state they reside in or not, and regardless of whether they have crossed a national border or not. Migranticization can be considered as a technology of power and governance; it places people in a distinct hierarchy which goes along with an unequal distribution of societal symbolic and material resources while it affirms a national ‘we’ within a system of global inequalities. The suggestion is to use migranticization as an analytical lens which makes it possible to investigate the uses of migration-related categories and their consequences in terms of power and ex/inclusion from/in a global system of inequalities and nation-states.