Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2022
License: CC BY
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Online Negotiation in the EU, Current Experiences, Challenges, and New Scenarios

Authors: Giacalone, Marco; Salehi, Sajedeh;

Online Negotiation in the EU, Current Experiences, Challenges, and New Scenarios

Abstract

This study aims at exploring the application of Online negotiation – as part of the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) regime in general – for resolving civil disputes in the EU. Within the last decades the notion of Online negotiation (hereinafter, e-negotiation) has received an extensive amount of scholarly attention. Previous studies mostly define e-negotiation as a ‘fourth party’ that facilitates a dispute resolution process for other three parties – namely, negotiators and the human facilitator – with the assistance of the ICT tools. The fourth party embodies a range of facilities such as organizing information, sending automatic responses, and modifying written communications in a more polite and constructive manner (i.e., blocking foul language). At a more advanced level, e-negotiation systems may also monitor performance, schedule meetings, clarify interests, and prioritize them for the parties to increase transparency and efficiency of dispute resolution procedure. Application of advanced e-negotiation provides the parties with an opportunity to have access to a neutral, super intelligent, and secure platform that assists them in reaching an agreement in an expedited and cost-effective manner. In recent years, e-negotiation has been used in a broad context covering litigious and non-litigious processes such as any alternative model of dispute resolution. So far, however, there has been little discussion about the status of using e-negotiation in dispute resolution in the EU. This study, therefore, investigates the most used practices in implementing e-negotiation for resolving civil disputes in the Union. Further, it critically analyses the EU ODR platform and its function in relation to the practice of e-negotiation for settling consumer disputes. Finally, this paper focuses on the lessons learnt from the application of e-negotiation for civil dispute resolution in EU and provides several important implications for the future of improvement in citizens’ access to justice through the application of effective e-negotiation models.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Online Negotiation, Online Dispute Resolution, Civil Disputes, EU

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 27
    download downloads 9
  • 27
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
27
9
Green