<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 2434/1007329 , 11384/124397 , 11579/132212
This paper examines the relationship between bodies and politics in order to show how images of corporeality construct modes of inclusion and exclusion and define processes of subjectivation. Beginning with an analysis of the frontispiece of Hobbes’s Leviathan, the paper explores the feminist criticisms of Margaret Cavendish and Mary Wollstonecraft. Then, the study considers biology’s laying claim to bodies in order to analyze processes of naturalization, read and criticized through the works of Carla Lonzi and Angela Putino. Finally, I address the concept of somatechnics to illustrate the stratification of political bodies.
Body, Biopolitics, Somatechnics, Feminism, Body; biopolitics; somatechnics; feminism
Body, Biopolitics, Somatechnics, Feminism, Body; biopolitics; somatechnics; feminism
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |