<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

SIENNA D5.1: Report documenting elements to open and complement operational guidelines for research ethics committees

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Report 30 Sep 2021 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | SIENNA

Authors: Lisa Tambornino; Dirk Lanzerath; Philipp Hoevel; Tom Lindemann;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5541598 , 10.5281/zenodo.5541599

SIENNA D5.1: Report documenting elements to open and complement operational guidelines for research ethics committees

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Research ethics committees (RECs) are well established to review health-related research projects. Nowadays, ethical assessments by RECs are requested not only for research projects in this field, but also beyond. However, standards and procedures for RECs outside the health-related research fields are still unclear or vague. Therefore, the question arises if and to what extent guidance documents and guidelines for RECs from the health-related field could be helpful to review research projects in other fields. In this report this question was analysed with a special focus on ethical reviews of research projects in the field emerging technologies.

Keywords

REC guidance documents, harmonisation, Research ethics committees, operational guidelines, ethical assessments

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average