Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Roadmap to collaboratively address RDM challenges

Authors: Sofia Fernandes;

A Roadmap to collaboratively address RDM challenges

Abstract

Research Data Management (RDM) and open data represents one of the main challenges faced by Higher Education Institutions as it requires compliance with ethical codes, responsible research, data protection, journal requirements and funder/institutional policies. In addition to these external drivers, RDM support was being delivered by dispersed teams across this university that can lead to a disjointed support, affecting infrastructure and tools, and does not reflect the institutional commitment towards RDM. A task and finish group, chaired by an academic, was set up to address these issues by reviewing existing practice to support RDM to co-ordinate activity and to identify future developments. Working collaboratively and interdisciplinarity, it was comprised of different elements of professional services involved in supporting RDM across the university. The group worked across seven strategic areas: Policies & Leadership; Relation to research assessment procedures; Advocacy & Support; Curation & Preservation; Infrastructure & Tools; Intellectual Property & Contracts; Ethics and accountability. And focused on these four activities of the research lifecycle (including both researchers and research support staff): Planning; Active Data Infrastructure; Data Stewardship and Research Data Support. The main goal was to deliver a RDM roadmap to improve support, infrastructure and services provided to researchers. To achieve this, it was necessary to understand how RDM support was being delivered and the research lifecycle workflow for funded projects works, recognize roles and responsibilities, and understand researchers’ needs through a survey. Main conclusions are that infrastructure, ethics, data sharing and open data are the main challenges researchers face. Training and guidance were the principal suggestions made. A workflow was drawn to represent and understand the diversity of processes (funded research, digital humanities) and an infographic was made available to support researchers in the research process, including systems. Roadmap actions focus on how to engage with researchers to better support them in a collaborative approach providing comprehensive support through a diversity of workflows, needs and systems This lightning talk aim to share good practices by presenting a different model through collaboration, engaging elements at various levels, that enabled interoperability across communities whilst supporting diversity of workflows and systems in the research community. It presents the work developed, achievements, outcomes and deliverables, key actions and lessons learned. It brings experiences and knowledge to align RDM strategy with research assessment that can be useful for other organizations that look synergies and continuous improvement, are conscious of the importance of responsible research, legal aspects in RDM and how interdisciplinary collaboration and interoperability across services can improve RDM support.

Keywords

Future Planning, Legal Frameworks, Research Culture, Collaboration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.