publication . Conference object . Preprint . 2021

Data Freshness in Mixed-Memory Intermittently-Powered Systems

Broadhead, James Scott; Pawełczak, Przemysław;
Open Access
  • Published: 13 May 2021
  • Publisher: IEEE
Abstract
Comment: 6 pages, 5 figures, for associated files please see https://github.com/TUDSSL/intermittency-aoi
Subjects
free text keywords: Computer Science - Information Theory, H.1.1
Funded by
EC| ENLIGHTEM
Project
ENLIGHTEM
European Training Network in Low-energy Visible Light IoT Systems
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 814215
  • Funding stream: H2020 | MSCA-ITN-ETN
Download fromView all 4 versions
Open Access
Zenodo
Conference object . 2021
Provider: Datacite
Open Access
ZENODO
Conference object . 2021
Provider: ZENODO
Open Access
Zenodo
Conference object . 2021
Provider: Datacite
24 references, page 1 of 2

[1] B. Lucia, V. Balaji, A. Colin, K. Maeng, and E. Ruppel, “Intermittent computing: Challenges and opportunities,” in Proc. SNAPL, Asilomar, CA, USA, May 2017.

[2] K. Ganesan, J. San Miguel, and N. Enright Jerger, “The what's next intermittent computing architecture,” in Proc. IEEE HPCA, Washington, DC, USA, Feb. 2019.

[3] M. Surbatovich, B. Lucia, and L. Jia, “Towards a formal foundation of intermittent computing,” in Proc. ACM OOPSLA, Chicago, IL, USA, Nov. 2020. [OpenAIRE]

[4] V. Kortbeek, K. S. Yıldırım, A. Bakar, J. Sorber, J. Hester, and P. Pawełczak, “Time-sensitive intermittent computing meets legacy software,” in Proc. ACM ASPLOS, Lausanne, Switzerland, Mar. 2020. [OpenAIRE]

[5] J. de Winkel, C. Delle Donne, K. S. Yıldırım, P. Pawełczak, and J. Hester, “Reliable timekeeping for intermittent computing,” in Proc. ACM ASPLOS, Lausanne, Switzerland, Mar. 2020.

[6] J. Hester and J. Sorber, “The future of sensing is batteryless, intermittent, and awesome,” in Proc. ACM SenSys, Delft, The Netherlands, Nov. 2017. [OpenAIRE]

[7] J. S. Broadhead and P. Przemysław, “Position paper: Why intermittent computing could unlock low-power visible light communication,” in Proc. Workshop on Light Up the IoT (ACM MobiCom 2020 Workshop), London, United Kingdom, Sep. 2020. [OpenAIRE]

[8] S. Kaul, R. D. Yates, and M. Gruteser, “Real-time status: How often should one update?” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Orlando, FL, USA, Mar. 2012.

[9] R. D. Yates, Y. Sun, D. R. Brown III, S. K. Kaul, E. Modiano, and S. Ulukus, “Age of information: An introduction and survey,” Jul. 2020, arXiv:2007.08564.

[10] C. Kam, S. Kompella, and A. Ephremides, “Age of information under random updates,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Istanbul, Turkey, Jul. 2013. [OpenAIRE]

[11] A. Behrouzi-Far, E. Soljanin, and R. D. Yates, “Data freshness in leaderbased replicated storage,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Jun. 2020.

[12] S. Kaul and R. D. Yates, “Age of information: Updates with priority,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Vail, CO, USA, May 2018.

[13] A. Baknina, S. Ulukus, O. Ozel, J. Yang, and A. Yener, “Sending information through status updates,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Vail, CO, USA, Jun. 2018.

[14] Y.-P. Hsu, E. Modiano, and L. Duan, “Age of information: Design and analysis of optimal scheduling algorithms,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Aachen, Germany, Jun. 2017.

[15] D. Balsamo, A. S. Weddell, A. Das, A. R. Arreola, D. Brunelli, B. M. AlHashimi, G. V. Merrett, and L. Benini, “Hibernus++: A self-calibrating and adaptive system for transiently-powered embedded devices,” IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1968-1980, Mar. 2016. [OpenAIRE]

24 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue