
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11572/177638
In his recent book “La valutazione possibile - Teoria e pratica nel mondo della ricerca, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2015” Andrea Bonaccorsi, former member of board of directors of Italian “National Agency for the Evaluation of the University and Research Systems (ANVUR)”, argues in favor of governmental evaluation of scientific research. The main argument of Bonaccorsi is that the governmental evaluation of scientific research is an expression of Mertonian norms of science (communism, universalism, disinterestedness, organized skepticism). The thesis is weak for two reasons. a) Bonaccorsi misrepresents Merton’s thought. b) He neglects the relationship between formal legal rules and informal norms.
Trento LawTech Research Paper nr. 30
Evaluation of Science, Open Science, Open Access to scientific publications, Andrea Bonaccorsi, Robert K. Merton, FOS: Law, Valutazione della ricerca, Sociologia della Scienza, Robert Merton, Ethos della scienza, Valutazione di stato, Valutazione governativa, ANVUR, Stato di diritto, Democrazia, Scienza Aperta, Revisione paritaria aperta, Evaluation of research, Research Assessment, Academic Capitalism, Research assessment, Law
Evaluation of Science, Open Science, Open Access to scientific publications, Andrea Bonaccorsi, Robert K. Merton, FOS: Law, Valutazione della ricerca, Sociologia della Scienza, Robert Merton, Ethos della scienza, Valutazione di stato, Valutazione governativa, ANVUR, Stato di diritto, Democrazia, Scienza Aperta, Revisione paritaria aperta, Evaluation of research, Research Assessment, Academic Capitalism, Research assessment, Law
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 19 | |
downloads | 5 |