Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Di-aléctica, Tri-aléctica, ..., n-aléctica, para n ≥ 2

Authors: Florentin Smarandache; Maikel Y. Leyva Vázquez;

Di-aléctica, Tri-aléctica, ..., n-aléctica, para n ≥ 2

Abstract

Este artículo explora el marco n-aléctico, que amplía los modelos di-alécticos y tri-alécticos tradicionales mediante la integración de múltiples subcomponentes a través de la lógica neutrosófica refinada. A partir de las filosofías precolombinas, en particular las tradiciones mesoamericanas, andinas y amazónicas, el estudio demuestra cómo las cosmovisiones indígenas se alinean con las estructuras n-alécticas. La figura de Quetzalcóatl/Kukulkán ilustra un equilibrio triádico entre el cielo, la tierra y el inframundo, mientras que los andinos Yanantin y Pachakuti reflejan una dualidad y transformación complementarias. La cosmología shuar ejemplifica además un complejo sistema n-aléctico, en el que múltiples fuerzas espirituales y naturales interactúan dinámicamente. El modelo de toma de decisiones éticas, aplicado a la extracción de recursos y a los principios de la Pachamama, utiliza métricas ponderadas y cálculos de distancia neutrosófica para evaluar las opciones sostenibles. Los resultados destacan el razonamiento n-aléctico como una poderosa herramienta para equilibrar factores económicos, medioambientales y sociales, promoviendo la integración armoniosa de fuerzas opuestas en la toma de decisiones.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average