publication . Conference object . 2018

Implementing a two-step decision-aid tool for the assessment of new mobility offers in a spatial framework

Rémy Le Boennec; Isabelle Nicolaï; Pascal Da Costa;
Open Access English
  • Published: 16 Apr 2018
  • Publisher: HAL CCSD
  • Country: France
Abstract
In this article we seek to elaborate various sustainable mobility scenarios depending on heterogeneous geographical contexts. We use a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to assess 50 mobility offers, relying on an original two-step assessment method. In a first step, we use the diviz decision-aid tool to obtain a global score for every offer, on the basis of 18 criteria that cover the three domains of sustainable development: economics, environment, society. In a second step, we use the MICMAC decision-aid tool to build relationships of influence and dependency between the 18 criteria. For each type of territory, we state what could be a development scenario for the future of mobility. Ultimately, an innovative hybrid mobility solution relies on the strengths and levers of the offers that were assessed, in response to the mobility scenario. We identify relevant solutions for dense and low-dense areas: in particular, carpooling offers reach particular efficiency in low-dense areas, combined with walking practices. Such combinations should be assisted by reliable multimodal mobility applications.
Persistent Identifiers

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1487510 , 10.5281/zenodo.1487511

Fields of Science (FOS) [Beta]
02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 020209 energy, 05 social sciences, 0502 economics and business, 050210 logistics & transportation
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) [Beta]
11. Sustainability, 12. Responsible consumption
Subjects
free text keywords: Analyse multi critère, decision-aid support, decision-aid tool, Multicriteria decision aid, Multicriteria Decision Analysis MCDA, mobility offer, Performance / performance, mobility usage, mobility use, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, multicriteria decision analysis, decision-aid tool, mobility offer, mobility usage., [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances, [SHS.ENVIR]Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, [INFO.INFO-RO]Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [cs.RO], [SPI.OTHER]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Other
Related Organizations
Download fromView all 7 versions
Open Access
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Conference object . 2018
Providers: Datacite
Open Access
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
Providers: ZENODO
null
Hyper Article en Ligne; Mémoires en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication; Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société; Hal-Diderot
Conference object . 2018
Providers: Hyper Article en Ligne; Mémoires en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication; Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société; Hal-Diderot
27 references, page 1 of 2

Barbosa, S. B., Ferreira, M. G. G., Nickel, E. M., Cruz, J. A., Forcellini, F. A., Garcia, J., de Andrade, J. B. S. O., 2017. Multi-criteria analysis model to evaluate transport systems: An application in Florianópolis, Brazil. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 96, 1-13.

Beria, P., Maltese, I., Mariotti, I., 2012. Multicriteria versus Cost Benefit Analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. European Transport Research Review 4(3), 137-152. [OpenAIRE]

Bueno, P. C., Vassallo, J. M., Cheung, K., 2015. Sustainability assessment of transport infrastructure projects: a review of existing tools and methods. Transport Reviews 35(5), 622-649.

Buhler, T., 2012. Eléments pour la prise en compte de l'habitude dans les pratiques de déplacements urbains: Le cas des résistances aux injonctions au changement de mode de déplacement sur l'agglomération lyonnaise (Doctoral dissertation, INSA de Lyon).

Cailloux, O., Mayag, B., Meyer, P., Mousseau, V., 2013. Operational tools to build a multicriteria territorial risk scale with multiple stakeholders. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 120, 88-97.

CGDD, DGE, PIPAME, 2016. “Usages novateurs de la voiture et nouvelles mobilités”, Rapport final, 270 p.

Chronos, L'Obsoco, 2016. L'observatoire des mobilités émergentes, Vague 2, sept. 2016, 217 p.

Créno, L., 2016. User experience of Dynamic Carpooling: How to encourage drivers and passengers? In: Energy Consumption and Autonomous Driving (pp. 71-81). Springer, Cham.

Dantan, S., Bulteau, J., Nicolaï, I., 2015. Hurried or risk-adverse travelers: who will pay more for multimodal information?. Procedia Engineering 115, 61-68. [OpenAIRE]

Dantan, S., Bulteau, J., Nicolaï, I., 2017. Enhancing sustainable mobility through a multimodal platform: would travellers pay for it?. International Journal of Sustainable Development 20(1-2), 33-55.

Deloitte, 2017. “Inclusive mobility: how mobilizing a diverse workforce cans drive business performance”, 18 p.

Faucheux, S., Nicolaï, I., 2004a. La responsabilité sociétale dans la construction d'indicateurs: l'expérience de l'industrie européenne de l'aluminium. Natures Sciences Sociétés 12(1), 30-41. [OpenAIRE]

Faucheux, S., Nicolaï, I., 2004b. Quels indicateurs pour la responsabilité sociale des entreprises? Une application à l'industrie de l'aluminium. Revue Gérer et Comprendre 76, 42-55. [OpenAIRE]

Godet, M., 2000. The art of scenarios and strategic planning: tools and pitfalls. Technological forecasting and social change 65(1), 3-22. [OpenAIRE]

Hüging, H., Glensor, K., Lah, O., 2014. Need for a holistic assessment of urban mobility measures-Review of existing methods and design of a simplified approach. Transportation Research Procedia 4, 3-13. [OpenAIRE]

27 references, page 1 of 2
graphPowered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue