Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Research . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

European Defense Integration after Trump's Re-Election: A Proposal to Revive the European Defense Community Treaty and its Legal Feasibility

Authors: Fabbrini, Federico;

European Defense Integration after Trump's Re-Election: A Proposal to Revive the European Defense Community Treaty and its Legal Feasibility

Abstract

Donald Trump’s re-election as President of the United States and Russia’s aggression of Ukraine pose unprecedented challenges to transatlantic relations and European security, as the EU is unprepared to take care of its defense. This paper explores how the law can be activated creatively to achieve defense integration in Europe and proposes to revive the 1952 European Defence Community (EDC) Treaty. Specifically, the paper claims that, in strictly legal terms, the EDC can be brought into operation today – simply with the ratification by 2 states: France and Italy – and provides comprehensive arguments from public international law, comparative law, and domestic constitutional law to make the point. Needless to say, legal feasibility does not equate with political feasibility, and the paper mentions several of the obstacles and challenges along this path. Yet, shedding light the EDC has two advantages. On the one and, the paper emphasizes how the EDC – with a common army, funded by a common budget and governed by supranational institutions – constituted an articulated response to the problem of securing European security, superior to the current CFSP framework. On the other, it identifies a differentiated path to achieve greater European defense integration, which appears more likely than amendment of the EU treaties, requiring agreement by 27 member states.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average