<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Utilising structural causal models to improve the study of science

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 19 Sep 2024Publisher:Zenodo

Authors: Klebel, Thomas; Traag, Vincent;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13797213 , 10.5281/zenodo.13797214

Utilising structural causal models to improve the study of science

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Causal inference is essential in science studies, yet many publications lack methods to substantiate causal claims. Structural causal models, often represented graphically with directed acyclic graphs, make causal assumptions transparent and improve communication. We illustrate the application with a hypothetical model of Open Science.

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average