Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Transforming Scholarly Publishing: A Community-Led Approach to Peer Review with PREreview

Authors: Fairhurst, Vanessa;

Transforming Scholarly Publishing: A Community-Led Approach to Peer Review with PREreview

Abstract

Talk by Vanessa Fairhurst, Head of Community at PREreview, at the FORCE11 conference which took place in-person at the UCLA campus, Los Angeles, California on Thursday 1st August 2024. Abstract: At PREreview, we are dedicated to fostering a more equitable, transparent, and accessible scholarly ecosystem. Our work is a direct response to the flawed way scientific research is evaluated. Behind closed doors, a handful of unpaid reviewers—selected opaquely and mainly through personal connections—use subjective criteria to decide the fate of a research article. Reviewers often undergo minimal training for this crucial task and have a lack of awareness of how to address issues of bias and systemic oppression, leading to a perpetuation of current inequities within scholarly publishing. In this talk, we'll explore PREreview's community-driven approach to transform peer review, rooted in values of accessibility, connectivity, self-awareness, and measurable impact, highlighting key features of our community-informed open preprint review platform, alongside our training programs aimed at fostering fair, constructive feedback while addressing systemic biases. You’ll hear case studies of the impact of creating a more open, equitable, and community-driven scholarly evaluation ecosystem from some of our global community members, as well as learn about key opportunities to join us in revolutionizing the peer-review process.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average