Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

EL IMPACTO EN EL RENDIMIENTO ACADÉMICO DE ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS A TRAVÉS DE DIFERENTES MODALIDADES DE ENSEÑANZA

Authors: Lorena Gabriela Hernández Arteaga1*, María del Lourdes Arias Gómez2, Lourdes Leticia Cárdenas Segovia3, Jesús Arias Gómez4, Braulio Hernández De León5;

EL IMPACTO EN EL RENDIMIENTO ACADÉMICO DE ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS A TRAVÉS DE DIFERENTES MODALIDADES DE ENSEÑANZA

Abstract

The implementation of different teaching modalities, such as virtual, in-person, and blended learning, has expanded in higher education institutions, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare the academic performance of 40 university students who took courses in virtual, in-person, and blended learning modalities. A questionnaire was administered to the students to measure their academic performance in terms of the average grades obtained during the periods in which they took courses in virtual, in-person, and blended learning modalities. The results showed statistically significant differences between the teaching modalities; higher academic performance was observed in students in the virtual modality (µ=89.35), showing a higher performance compared to the blended learning modality by 4.81508 points (sig. = 0.001) and 9.77226 points (sig.= 0.000) compared to the in-person modality. It is concluded that further studies are needed considering other variables such as student satisfaction, digital competencies, and teaching strategies.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities