<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The implementation of different teaching modalities, such as virtual, in-person, and blended learning, has expanded in higher education institutions, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare the academic performance of 40 university students who took courses in virtual, in-person, and blended learning modalities. A questionnaire was administered to the students to measure their academic performance in terms of the average grades obtained during the periods in which they took courses in virtual, in-person, and blended learning modalities. The results showed statistically significant differences between the teaching modalities; higher academic performance was observed in students in the virtual modality (µ=89.35), showing a higher performance compared to the blended learning modality by 4.81508 points (sig. = 0.001) and 9.77226 points (sig.= 0.000) compared to the in-person modality. It is concluded that further studies are needed considering other variables such as student satisfaction, digital competencies, and teaching strategies.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |