Found an issue? Give us feedback

ZENODOarrow_drop_down

ZENODO

Other literature type . 2018

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Data sources: ZENODO

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Claim

Recommendations on the development, use and provision of Research Software

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Other literature type 16 Mar 2018 English Zenodo

Katerbow, Matthias; Feulner, Georg;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1172988

Recommendations on the development, use and provision of Research Software

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

These recommendations describe challenges relating to research software and provide recommendations for the development, use and provision of this type of software. The relevance of research software to modern research should be clearly underlined, especially in the context of political debate on digital transformation in the sciences and humanities. This document was prepared by the Research Software Working Group, established in 2016, within the Alliance initiative. The members of the working group are (in alphabetical order): Mathias Bornschein, Prof. Dr. Björn Brembs, Dr. Michael Erben-Russ, Dr. Georg Feulner, Dr. Konrad Förstner, Michael Franke, Dr. Bernadette Fritzsch, Dr. Jürgen Fuhrmann, Prof. Dr. Michael Goedicke, Stephan Janosch, Dr. Matthias Katerbow, Dr. Uwe Konrad, Dennis Zielke.

Keywords

Research Software

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Usage byUsageCounts

visibility	views	3K
download	downloads	954

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

BIP!

3K
views
954
downloads
Powered by

Found an issue? Give us feedback

visibility

download

Average

954