Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

International collaboration as a common approach to improve the FAIRness of non-numeric/ qualitative research data

Authors: Mozygemba, Kati; Betancort Cabrera, Noemi;

International collaboration as a common approach to improve the FAIRness of non-numeric/ qualitative research data

Abstract

The future of sharing and reusing qualitative research materials will be shaped by technological innovations, ethical considerations, privacy and data security issues, collaborative efforts, and an increased focus on improving the rigor and applicability of findings derived from existing non-numeric/qualitative datasets. Due to the sensitivity and comprehensiveness of the data, the integration of (AI-based) technology in data curation, data sharing and data analysis workflows needs to be carefully addressed, as well as issues of interdisciplinary approaches. Furthermore, researchers from different disciplines will be interested in using qualitative data, and vice versa, qualitative researchers will be interested in using data from other methodological backgrounds that lend themselves to the application of qualitative analysis. In the face of these developments and challenges, collaboration between data infrastructures with expertise in the curation and provision of qualitative data is key. Networks such as QualidataNet, a community-centered federated network of RDCs, seek to share and discuss common solutions for harmonization and standardization where possible. Its focus is to provide a single point of access to qualitative datasets from different data providers and to promote the sharing and reuse of qualitative data in line with the FAIR Data Principles. QualidataNet is part of the Consortium for Social, Behavioral, Educational and Economic Sciences (KonsortSWD) at the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) in Germany. It coordinates the international cooperation within the DDI via the DDI-CDI Subgroup "Non-Numeric, Non-Code Datums", which aims at a standardized and comprehensive metadata description of data objects to enable cross domain integration. We will present the current work, future steps and plans of this international effort: In addition, we would like to continue exploring opportunities for international collaboration and exchange, and invite for participation with the goal of shaping FAIR's ways of processing, archiving, and reusing qualitative data objects.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average