<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
In this essay, we explore Cooper’s theorizing of institutional aesthetics andtechnology to analyse a field study of a commoning process at a recreational area atLinnarhult near Gothenburg, Sweden. The paper focuses on a series of craftinterventions that used the willow plant to make the area a common space. UsingCooper’s theories, we analyse the community craft activities conducted at Linnarhultas an aesthetic process of making a common space by crafting frames, boundaries andreflections on site. We thus conclude by highlighting the process of commoningthrough institutional aesthetics, and we reflect on our attempt to use Cooper’stheoretical ideas in analysing a concrete case. His emphasis and exemplary writing onthe aesthetics of institutions has inspired us greatly, but our exploration has comewith challenges and probably a deal of betrayal.
Craft, Aesthetics, Craft practices, Robert Cooper, Communing
Craft, Aesthetics, Craft practices, Robert Cooper, Communing
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |