<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This research paper offers a thorough examination of the benefits and drawbacks of applying quantitative methods to research in a range of academic fields. The precision, objectivity, and capacity to extrapolate results to larger populations are all provided by quantitative methods. They do, however, also bring with them certain difficulties, such as the need to ensure the validity and reliability of data collection processes and to capture subtle qualitative aspects of phenomena. Through a critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative methods, researchers are better equipped to choose their research approaches. Researchers are advised to carefully evaluate research questions, validation methods, and ethical guidelines. To further the field of research methodology, future research directions should concentrate on interdisciplinary collaboration, creative methodologies, and integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |