

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All along the Watchtower: Intersectional diversity as a core intellectual value in the Digital Humanities
All along the Watchtower: Intersectional diversity as a core intellectual value in the Digital Humanities
A discussion of the "Diversity Debate" in the Digital Humanities, with particular reference to DH 2016. Chapter compares DH as a paradiscipline to area disciplines such as Medieval Studies and argues a) that "Diversity" cannot be distinguished from "Quality" within the Digital Humanities; and b) even if it could, "Diversity" would be more important than "Quality" for the progress of the field. Concludes with a discussion on the importance (and ethics) of discussing ostensibly private or closed debates among "gatekeeper" committees within DH, arguing that such conversations have played an outsized role in the development of the field and must be treated as a core part of the discipline's history.
Digital Humanities, Quality, Diversity, Medieval Studies, ADHO (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organisations), DH 2016 (Conference)
Digital Humanities, Quality, Diversity, Medieval Studies, ADHO (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organisations), DH 2016 (Conference)
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average visibility views 239 download downloads 284 citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!
- 239views284downloads



A discussion of the "Diversity Debate" in the Digital Humanities, with particular reference to DH 2016. Chapter compares DH as a paradiscipline to area disciplines such as Medieval Studies and argues a) that "Diversity" cannot be distinguished from "Quality" within the Digital Humanities; and b) even if it could, "Diversity" would be more important than "Quality" for the progress of the field. Concludes with a discussion on the importance (and ethics) of discussing ostensibly private or closed debates among "gatekeeper" committees within DH, arguing that such conversations have played an outsized role in the development of the field and must be treated as a core part of the discipline's history.