
doi: 10.5254/1.3540276
Abstract In a review by Weidner and Crocker, published, under this title, in Rubber Reviews for 1960, there is expressed a series of critical remarks about the development by my collaborators and me of the diffusion theory of specific adhesion of polymers. Unfortunately, the authors of the review made use of only four articles, having ignored a series of recent articles and my special monograph which appeared in 1960. This probably was the cause of the one-sided view of Weidner and Crocker. I will try here very briefly to cite some principles of the diffusion theory of adhesion which the review has disregarded and also I will endeavor to reply to some of the comments of the authors.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
