Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repository of the Cz...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Ceskoslovenska psychologie
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Autistic and dysphasic children differ in social responsiveness and empathy but not in systemizing behavior

Authors: Hrdlička, M.; Urbánek, T. (Tomáš); Mrkvička, A.; Komárek, V.; Pospíšilová, L.; Mohaplová, M.; Blatný, M.; +1 Authors

Autistic and dysphasic children differ in social responsiveness and empathy but not in systemizing behavior

Abstract

Objectives. the Social responsiveness Scale (SrS) and the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient (EQ/SQ) scale are both used for the assessment of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). this study aimed to investigate the use of both scales to assess another neurodevelopmental disorder, namely developmental dysphasia (DD). Additionally, the study examined differences in social, empathetic, and systemizing\ncharacteristics between ASD and DD groups. Sample and settings. the authors examined 103 children with (1) ASD (n = 30, mean age 8.4 ± ± 2.6 years), (2) DD (n = 35, mean age 8.9 ± ± 2.3 years), and (3) healthy control children (Hc, n = 38, mean age 9.2 ± 1.6 years) using the SrS and EQ/SQ assessments. Subjects with additional psychiatric diagnoses, e.g., intellectual disabilities and/or genetic syndromes, were excluded from the study. Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics, oneway AnOVA, chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis test with the Bonferroni correction were used. Hypotheses. the null hypothesis was that there are no significant differences between the ASD, DD and Hc subgroups on the Social responsiveness Scale and on the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotients. Results. there were statistically significant \ndifferences on the SrS between the ASD, DD, and Hc groups (97.0 vs. 52.0 vs. 29.0, p<0.001). Differences in EQ scores were also significant between the groups in total (17.0 vs. 30.0 vs. 35.0, p<0.001), however, post-hoc tests did not confirm a significant difference between the DD and Hc groups. there were no statistically significant differences on the SQ score between the groups. Limitations. the gender imbalance of subgroups and relatively small sample size of the study were main limitations of the study.

Related Organizations
Keywords

autism, systemizing, developmental dysphasia, social responsiveness, empathizing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green