
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The status of Lattice QCD is reviewed with respect to results that are relevant to Standard Model phenomenology. I argue that in a few simple cases all (or almost all) systematic errors from the lattice calculation are under control. Lattice QCD calculations of quarkonia ($\bb$ and $\cc$) have yielded precise determinations of the strong coupling, $��_s$, and the heavy quark masses. Recent work on the kaon $B$ parameter has also led to a significant reduction in systematic errors, resulting in a precise determination of this hadronic matrix element. I discuss recent progress in other calculations of potential phenomenological significance, as well as problems and prospects.
replaced Figure 4 in manuscript. The correct results (from F. Butler, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 217) are $f_{\pi}/m_{\rho} = 0.150 (20)$, $f_K/m_{\rho} = 0.174 (13)$ and $f_K/f_{\pi} = 1.157 (87)$. 24 pages uuencoded postscript; review talk presented at Physics in Collisions '94, Tallahassee, FL, June 15-17 1994
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Lattice, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), High Energy Physics - Lattice (hep-lat), FOS: Physical sciences
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Lattice, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), High Energy Physics - Lattice (hep-lat), FOS: Physical sciences
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
