Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Vertical thoracotomy versus conventional posterolateral thoracotomy

Authors: Ahmed H Onsi; Ahmed L Dokhan; Alaa A Elsesy; Medhat R Nashy;

Vertical thoracotomy versus conventional posterolateral thoracotomy

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of vertical thoracotomy as a thoracic approach. Background A carefully planned thoracic incision should provide effortless and excellent exposure, preservation of the underlying anatomy and function, and a cosmetically acceptable result. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective, cohort study in which 30 consecutive patients were exposed to two types of thoracotomies performed by the surgeons of the cardiothoracic surgery Department in Menoufia University Hospital from October 2012 to October 2014. The patients were classified randomly into two groups: group A (n = 15) in which vertical thoracotomy was performed and group B (n = 15) in which standard posterolateral thoracotomy was performed. Operative data were collected from all patients in both groups as regards indication of operation, type of operation, intraoperative complications such as bleeding, need of extension of the incision, total operative time, and time of opening and closure of the thoracotomy. Results Results showed that vertical thoracotomy can be used for a wide range of procedures in different age groups and in both sexes. Shoulder joint movement was significantly better when vertical thoracotomy was used (P = 0.044), and cosmetic results are better. Conclusion Vertical thoracotomy offers specific advantages of minimum trauma and maximum preservation of chest wall function with a cosmetically acceptable scar.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!