Quality assessment of doctoral programmes

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 30 Oct 2001Publisher:AOSISJournal:Health SA Gesondheid, volume 6, pages 46-54 (issn: 1025-9848, eissn: 2071-9736,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Shaké Ketefian;

doi: 10.4102/hsag.v6i2.66

Quality assessment of doctoral programmes

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to focus attention on the different ways in which doctoral education can be evaluated. *Please note: This is a reduced version of the abstract. Please refer to PDF for full text.

Related Organizations

University of Michigan–Flint
United States
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
United States

Keywords

Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average