
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.5.4
pmid: 19585961
Background: A vestibulospinal test known as the Fukuda stepping test (FST) has been suggested to be a measure of asymmetrical labyrinthine function. However, an extensive review of the performance of this test to identify a peripheral vestibular lesion has not been reported. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the standard FST and a head shaking variation for identification of a peripheral vestibular system lesion. Research Design: In this retrospective review, we compared performance on the FST with and without a head shaking component to electronystagmography (ENG) caloric irrigation unilateral weakness results. Study Sample: We studied these factors in 736 chronic dizzy patients. Results: Receiving operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) indicated no significant benefit to performance from the head shaking variation compared to the standard FST in identifying labyrinthine weakness as classified by caloric unilateral weakness results. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the FST with and without head shake component is not a reliable screening tool for peripheral vestibular asymmetry in chronic dizzy patients; however, future research may hold promise for the FST as a tool for patients with acute unilateral disorders.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Vestibular Function Tests, Diagnosis, Differential, Young Adult, Head Movements, Sensation Disorders, Humans, Female, Postural Balance, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Vestibular Function Tests, Diagnosis, Differential, Young Adult, Head Movements, Sensation Disorders, Humans, Female, Postural Balance, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
