
This study investigated the impact of the depulping of cocoa beans after pod opening, as well as the influences of pod storage (PS) and fermentation time on the fermentation dynamics and the overall quality of beans and liquors made thereof. Twelve variations were conducted in three experimental runs (with/without depulping; 1-/3-day PS; and fermentation times of 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days). Fermentation dynamics (e.g., temperature and pH) and the quality of dried beans (e.g., cut-test and fermentation index) and liquors (sensory assessment, quantification of cocoa key-odorants and tastants) were investigated. It was demonstrated that 17–20% of cocoa pulp, relative to the total bean-pulp-mass weight, could be mechanically removed without negatively affecting the bean quality. No significant differences were found in the percentages of well-fermented beans after 5–6 days fermentation with 1-day PS, resulting in 49 ± 9% with, and 48 ± 12% without depulping. There were no significant differences in key tastants present in the liquors; however, significantly less volatile acids and esters were found when liquors were produced from 5–6 day-fermented depulped beans, with 1-day PS, without negatively affecting the sensory profiles. This strategy allows producers to maximize the cacao fruit’s value by integrating part of the pulp into the cocoa value chain.
pulp-preconditioning, key taste compounds, Key taste compound, Chemical technology, cocoa beans, cocoa liquor, post-harvesting, TP1-1185, Cocoa liquor, Sensory analysis, Article, Key aroma compound, Cocoa bean, Post-harvesting, Pulp-preconditioning, key aroma compounds, 664: Lebensmitteltechnologie, Quality assessment
pulp-preconditioning, key taste compounds, Key taste compound, Chemical technology, cocoa beans, cocoa liquor, post-harvesting, TP1-1185, Cocoa liquor, Sensory analysis, Article, Key aroma compound, Cocoa bean, Post-harvesting, Pulp-preconditioning, key aroma compounds, 664: Lebensmitteltechnologie, Quality assessment
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
