
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.3390/en10091262
handle: 20.500.11824/724 , 11583/2995591
This paper proposes an optimisation strategy for the layout design of wave energy converter (WEC) arrays. Optimal layouts are sought so as to maximise the absorbed power given a minimum q-factor, the minimum distance between WECs, and an area of deployment. To guarantee an efficient optimisation, a four-parameter layout description is proposed. Three different optimisation algorithms are further compared in terms of performance and computational cost. These are the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA), a genetic algorithm (GA) and the glowworm swarm optimisation (GSO) algorithm. The results show slightly higher performances for the latter two algorithms; however, the first turns out to be significantly less computationally demanding.
Technology, optimisation, swarm intelligence, T, Swarm intelligence, wave energy arrays, evolution strategy, Wave energy arrays, Array layouts, Evolution strategy, array layout, wave energy arrays; array layout; optimisation; evolution strategy; swarm intelligence, Optimisation, Array layout; Evolution strategy; Optimisation; Swarm intelligence; Wave energy arrays
Technology, optimisation, swarm intelligence, T, Swarm intelligence, wave energy arrays, evolution strategy, Wave energy arrays, Array layouts, Evolution strategy, array layout, wave energy arrays; array layout; optimisation; evolution strategy; swarm intelligence, Optimisation, Array layout; Evolution strategy; Optimisation; Swarm intelligence; Wave energy arrays
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
