
handle: 10197/1323
We introduce an index of trade policy restrictiveness defined as the uniform tariff that maintains the same trade volume as a given tariff/quota structure. Our index overcomes the problems of the trade‐weighted average tariff: It avoids substitution bias, correctly accounts for general equilibrium transfers, and takes import volume instead of welfare as benchmark. Empirical applications to international cross section and time‐series comparisons of trade policy confirm our theoretical results: Trade‐weighted average tariffs generally underestimate the true height of tariffs as measured by the trade‐volume‐equivalent index; this in turn always underestimates the welfare‐equivalent index.
Commercial policy, International trade policy; Quotas; Tariffs; trade liberalisation; Trade Restrictiveness Index, Economics, Restraint of trade, Trade liberalisation, International trade policy, tariffs, quotas, Trade Restrictiveness Index, trade liberalization, Tariffs; Quotas; Trade Restrictiveness Index; Trade liberalisation; International trade policy; International trade; Tariff; Restraint of trade; Commercial policy, International trade policy, International trade, Quotas, Trade Restrictiveness Index, Tariff, F13, Tariffs, jel: jel:L81, jel: jel:F13
Commercial policy, International trade policy; Quotas; Tariffs; trade liberalisation; Trade Restrictiveness Index, Economics, Restraint of trade, Trade liberalisation, International trade policy, tariffs, quotas, Trade Restrictiveness Index, trade liberalization, Tariffs; Quotas; Trade Restrictiveness Index; Trade liberalisation; International trade policy; International trade; Tariff; Restraint of trade; Commercial policy, International trade policy, International trade, Quotas, Trade Restrictiveness Index, Tariff, F13, Tariffs, jel: jel:L81, jel: jel:F13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 89 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
