publication . Article . 2018

Semiotic Documentary Measurement by Pavel Faryenyuk

Оlena Moskalenko-Vysotska;
Open Access
  • Published: 20 Jun 2018 Journal: Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series in Audiovisual Art and Production (issn: 2617-2674, eissn: 2617-4049, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to reveal the construction of the system of images and signs in the documentary films of the famous Ukrainian film director Pavel Nikolaevich Faryenyuk. The urgency of the problem, which the article is devoted to, is that Ukrainian art critics, in fact, did not investigate the use of artistic images in the national documentary documentary of our time. The methodology of the research is based on the logical-analytical method (for elucidating the artistic means of using technical director’s techniques when creating screen images); formalization method (for studying various screen episodes, which are reflected in a symbolic form with ...
Persistent Identifiers
Subjects
free text keywords: documentary film; author’s decision; artistic image; symbol; sign, 791.229.2:7.071.2(477), документальный фильм; авторское решение; художественный образ; символ; знак, документальний фільм; авторське вирішення; художній образ; символ; знак, документальний фільм, авторське вирішення, художній образ, символ, знак, Originality, media_common.quotation_subject, media_common, Spatial relation, Documentary film, Novelty, Film director, Contemporary art, Chronotope, History, Ukrainian, language.human_language, language, Visual arts, lcsh:Fine Arts, lcsh:N, lcsh:Visual arts, lcsh:N1-9211

1. Bart, R. (2003). 'Problema znacheniya v kino' Sistema Mody. Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury [Fashion System. Articles on semiotics of culture].

2. Bazen, A. (1972) Chto takoe kino? Translated from French by V. Bozhovich. Moscow : Рubl. House “Iskusstvo”.

3. Hrytsuk, V. (2007). 'Tanok kazok dovkola dokumenta'. Cinema-theater [Kino-teatr], no.1 (69), рр. 52-53.

4. Denysko, P.V. (2011). Neprozorist znakiv yak problema semiotychnoi estetyky. Аbstract. Poltava National Technical University named after Yuri Kondratyuk.

5. Didenko, I. (1984). 'Ya nash narod tsilym sertsem liubliu…. '. Na ekranakh Ukrainy [On the screens of Ukraine], August 4, р. 2.

6. Dubenko S., (1984). 'Pershyi kinopam'yatnyk Fedkovychu'. Radianska Bukovyna [Soviet Bukovina], December 7, p. 6.

7. Konstantynov, M.V. (2017). Lotman ta vizualna semiotyka druhoi polovyny KhKh st. (Istoryko-filosofskyi analiz). D.Ed. Dniprovsky National University named after Oles Gonchar.

8. Lotman, Ju. (1973). Semiotics of cinema and problems of cinema aesthetics. Tallin : Jejesti Raamat.

9. Lotman, Ju. (1970). Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Moscow : Prosveshhenie.

10. Makiienko, M. (2009). 'Khudozhnii obraz i symvol yak osnova prostorovochasovoi realnosti kinofilmu'. Molodyi vchenyi [Young scientist], no. 8, рр. 190-197.

11. Metc, K. (2013). Voobrazhaemoe oznachayushchee. Psikhoanaliz i kino. St. Petersburg : Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge.

12. Potebnja, A. (2007). Simvol i mif v narodnoy kul'ture. Moscow : Labirint. © Москаленко-Висоцька О. М., 2018 Стаття надійшла до редакції 30.05.2018

Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue